|
Articles suggested here must already be featured articles. Articles do not have to be suggested to appear on the main page. Requests must be for dates within the next 30 days that have not yet been scheduled. There may be no more than five total requests on this page at any time. If there are already five articles requested and if the article that you would like to request has a point value higher than the request with the lowest point value, you may replace it according to the instructions below. Requests are not the only factor in scheduling today's featured article; the final decision rests with the featured article director (Raul654). Please confine date requests to this page, and remember that community endorsement on this page does not mean the article will appear on the requested date. See also User:Raul654/Featured article thoughts. It is helpful to put the request, with the estimated point score (see below), up for discussion on the talk page pending template up to 60 days before the requested date; requestors should return to move the request to this page during the 30-day timeframe if the article has enough points to replace another article. |
Featured article tools:
Toolbox
|
||
|
Calculating points: Points are the sum of choices for each of the following six criteria:
Notes
Adding requests Please nominate only one article at a time. The article must not have been previously featured as Today's Featured Article. Nominations are ordered by requested date below the summary chart. The archive of previously featured articles is here. If there are already five requests, and if the article you propose to add has more points than than one of the articles already requested, you may remove a request and add yours (explaining in your post the claimed point total) according to the following:
|
|||
Summary chart
|
Currently accepting requests from September 4 to October 4.
The chart will be updated regularly by editors who follow this page:
| Date | Article | Points | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8 | Yellowstone fires of 1988 | 5 | 20-yr anniversary |
| Sep 11 | United Airlines Flight 93 | 3 | Anniversary |
| Sep 24 | Myst | 1 | Release anniversary |
Requests
September 8
Replaced Michael Jackson which was requested for 8/29 due to oppose and only two points for the nominator and one support...[1]
Self nominating Yellowstone fires of 1988 for 9/8/2008 due to 20 year anniversary of the fires which closed Yellowstone National Park for the first time in its history on that date. Equates to 2 pts decennary and 2 points for no similar articles in six months. Most significant event to occur in the history of the National Park Service and Yellowstone NP for that matter...at least since both the park and the park service were founded.--MONGO 22:27, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Plus one point for more than a year since featured = 5 points. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:31, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:30, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Aude (talk) 20:18, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support - as this looks promising, it'd be good if you'd expand the blurb you posted above. NB, I think you need a pausal comma near the date, ie "and, on September 8, 1988," to mark off the subordinate clause. --Dweller (talk) 09:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Done...both suggestions...thanks!--MONGO 22:34, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support Looks good –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 13:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support Karanacs (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
September 11
Nominating United Airlines Flight 93 for Today's FA on September 11—the 7th anniversary of the attacks. One point for date, one point for no similar articles within three months, one point for myself never having nominated a TFAR. --> 3 pts. (Note: there should be a paragraph break after "wrest control of the aircraft", but it's not coming up on my computer for some reason) -- Veggy (talk) 15:07, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support Good nomination, if a little early. I think we need to rethink how early we allow nominations on this page, as there are limited slots available. --Dweller (talk) 15:17, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
-
- Really? Limited slots? How exactly does the process work? Who decides when articles go on the page because it looks random besides the requests on here. -- Veggy (talk) 15:30, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support - Very appropriate article for the day, excellent idea. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support - It must be run on this day! 100% relevant to the date. Dincher (talk) 00:54, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support Date relevance and the article is well written, espcially considering the long standing arguments that were finally worked out.--MONGO 05:32, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support. Definitely appropriate since the article concerns an event named after the date that it occurred. Cla68 (talk) 06:25, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support Great choice, relevant to date, well written article. Pie is good (Apple is the best) 00:18, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Comment article does not mention conspiracy theories about the plane having been shot down.--Aejrad (talk) 20:35, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Perhaps it would be wise to discuss that on the article talk page. I know there is a 9/11 conspiracy theories article, look it up, it may be discussed there.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This user has no contributions other than his comment about conspiracy theories. Presenting these baseless theories constitutes undue weight and, as such, are not mentioned. -- Veggy (talk) 21:00, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Aude (talk) 20:18, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support I even gave thought to not making a nomination so that this one would have a better chance. It's hard to image a more appropriate article for this date. Maybe a case to apply WP:IAR if a point-based system would knock it off.Kww (talk) 20:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support Wish we had WP:SNOW apply to this page.--Wehwalt (talk) 21:55, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I suggest this nomination get one more for notability. I know the idea is that a 12 year old might do an assignment about the topic, and that children's books have been written about it. Well, here is a children's book about Flight 93. --Aude (talk) 22:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
-
- Comment: I think the problem is the point for anniversary. For an event like this that takes place on one day, it gets the same point as the Holloway disappearance that can technically be "anniversaried" on multiple days. -- Veggy (talk) 22:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, but you have Yellowstone with the same thing, and for all the talk about the most significant event in the history of the NPS, Sept 8 isn't mentioned in the blurb, and you have to dig to find it. And planet, we always had planets, Aug 24 is the anniversary of really dwarf planets being defined away. There were others, but they are off the page now.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:30, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yellowstone fires hits 44 books and UA 93 hits 9 from amazon.com children's books. (I'm unclear if we've come to consensus on how to determine the notability point, but I'd give a point to both of them, and then they're both probably safe from being replaced.) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:40, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Sandy, let's leave status quo. NO ONE is going to remove the 9/11 article, I mean NO ONE. If Yao spent three weeks at two points and no one removed him, no one is going to touch this article. That effectively shields Yellowstone. Let's just leave things be. If I'm wrong, I will personally throw egg on my face. As for notability, I think we had unanimous support for removal but not enough editors for anyone to feel comfortable there was consensus, so I think we tacitly decided to throw all proposals out out and reassess after Labor Day--Wehwalt (talk) 23:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to agree (that is, that they have enough points to stay on the page, hence, no need to stir the nest of the notability point). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:19, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Sandy, let's leave status quo. NO ONE is going to remove the 9/11 article, I mean NO ONE. If Yao spent three weeks at two points and no one removed him, no one is going to touch this article. That effectively shields Yellowstone. Let's just leave things be. If I'm wrong, I will personally throw egg on my face. As for notability, I think we had unanimous support for removal but not enough editors for anyone to feel comfortable there was consensus, so I think we tacitly decided to throw all proposals out out and reassess after Labor Day--Wehwalt (talk) 23:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yellowstone fires hits 44 books and UA 93 hits 9 from amazon.com children's books. (I'm unclear if we've come to consensus on how to determine the notability point, but I'd give a point to both of them, and then they're both probably safe from being replaced.) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:40, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support- Good article for the date. Halgin (talk) 01:45, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support - I can't believe it has been 7 years! Perfect selection. H1nkles (talk) 20:46, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
September 24
Yeah, I know it will prolly get booted, but in the meantime... 1 point for date connection (release date, 15 years ago) and 1 point for no video game articles appearing as TFA by the time Myst would go up. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 01:59, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
- NO video games within three months? What was the last one? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:17, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, whoops, I was thinking of deductions... Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 02:49, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
- So, is it one point? Can you update the chart? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:51, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, whoops, I was thinking of deductions... Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 02:49, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia content modification information:
- This page was last modified on 21 August 2008, at 03:10.
Wikipedia Authorship and Review
Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by PediaView.com. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with PediaView.com.
Wikipedia Usage Guidelines
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests".
The URL for this specific entry is:
All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
